Legal Opinion

Milliken v. Fredrickson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 2, 1923No. 10,100PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Campbell

Plaintiff in error Milliken, defendant below, had a mine in Nicaragua, Central America. Fredrickson, defendant in error, plaintiff below, had money in Omaha for investment. Milliken needed money to develop his mine; Fredrickson wanted mining property. As each desired to accommodate the other, they entered into a contract March 2, 1915, supplemented by a later one of March 27, which enabled Fredrickson at once to part with some, and later with much more, of his money and afforded Milliken the opportunity to divest himself of an interest in his property. In the first contract there was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peck v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907
  2. Lamont v. ReynoldsColorado Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Jones v. Van HornSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  4. Wahl v. LarsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sturm v. UlrichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  2. Maniatis v. StinySupreme Court of Colorado · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API