Legal Opinion

Wahl v. Larsen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 6, 1921No. 9834PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover value of ore from a mine in which plaintiff had an interest. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Francis E. Bouck, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Plaintiff brought this action to recover his share of the value of ore taken and sold from the Star mine in Gunnison County of which he owns an undivided one-fourth. It is admitted that he is the owner of such interest, that the ore was taken therefrom and sold by defendants, as claimed. The defendants are co-owners. The only question in issue is the amount to be credited to them in connection with the expense of mining and disposing of the ore. The trial court made findings and entered judgment for plaintiff in the sum of $335.46, which he brings here for review. The parties are designated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. ChildsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  2. Stickley v. MulrooneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Milliken v. FredricksonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  2. Larson v. WahlSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API