Legal Opinion

Litman v. GEICO Casualty Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 2023No. 2:22-cv-04530Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DONALD LITMAN et al : Plaintiffs, : CIVIL ACTION NO. : v. : 22-cv-04530-RAL : GEICO CASUALTY COMPANY : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM Defendant, GEICO Casualty Company (“GEICO”), has moved under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss Counts II and II of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint. Doc. No. 36. Count II alleges a violation of the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law, 73 Pa. Stat. Ann. §§ 201-1, et seq. (UTPCPL) and Count III alleges bad faith pursuant to 42 Pa. C.S.A. § 8371. Doc. No. 35, at ¶¶…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  4. Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API