Legal Opinion
Amway Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Company Procter & Gamble Distributing Company Dinsmore & Shohl, Llp, Sidney Schwartz Kenneth Lowndes
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided October 8, 2003No. 01-2561PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.
SCHWARZER, District Judge (pp. 188-90), delivered a separate concurring opinion.
OPINION
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Amway Corporation (“Amway”) appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants The Procter and Gamble Company, The Procter and Gamble Distributing Company (collectively “P & G”), and the law firm of Dinsmore & Shohl (“Dins-more”) (P & G and Dinsmore collectively “Appellees”), in Amway’s diversity action raising a Michigan state-law claim of “tor-tious interference with contract and with actual and prospective business relations,” over…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. MehraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Sun Valley Foods Co. v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. Detroit Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. HaugenDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2007
- Amway Corporation v. The Procter & Gamble Company Procter & Gamble Distributing Company Dinsmore & Shohl, Llp, Sidney Schwartz Kenneth LowndesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Bryan Punturo v. Brace KernMichigan Supreme Court · 2020
- Michael J Bedford v. Derek S WitteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.