Legal Opinion

Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 6, 2007No. 1:95-cv-00094PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE LANHAM ACT CLAIM

STEWART, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ Motions for Summary Judgment on the Lanham Act claim. The Court need not recount this case’s long and complicated procedural history, except to note that, after ten years of litigation, the Lan-ham Act claim is the only claim that remains for the upcoming jury trial. The background facts necessary to understand the current motions are that sometime in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers S.A. v. American Institute of PhysicsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  3. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Amway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  4. Joan M. Steffes v. Stepan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. HaugenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sorensen v. PolukoffDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API