United States v. Niles
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*718OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL
CARTER, Judge:
This case comes to us from a sentence rehearing after a long and tortured history. The primary issue presented is whether a sentence rehearing on affirmed findings of guilty restarts the two-year period for filing a petition for a new trial under Article 73, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 873 [hereinafter UCMJ]. We hold that a sentence rehearing does not restart the two-year filing period for a new trial petition for affirmed findings of guilty.
History of the Case
Appellant was a member of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WebbArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000