Legal Opinion

United States v. Niles

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided February 14, 2000No. ARMY 9200448PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*718OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL

CARTER, Judge:

This case comes to us from a sentence rehearing after a long and tortured history. The primary issue presented is whether a sentence rehearing on affirmed findings of guilty restarts the two-year period for filing a petition for a new trial under Article 73, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 873 [hereinafter UCMJ]. We hold that a sentence rehearing does not restart the two-year filing period for a new trial petition for affirmed findings of guilty.

History of the Case

Appellant was a member of…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  4. Clinton v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WebbArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API