Legal Opinion

Sackman Bros. v. Hoey

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 31, 1942No. 166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The question presented by this appeal is whether certain garments manufactured and sold by the plaintiff as “Baseball Play Suits” in age sizes 12 to 16 inclusive were taxable as “baseball uniforms” or “similar articles commonly or commercially known as sporting goods,” within the meaning of section 609 of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 264, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Acts, page 612.

The plaintiff manufactures a line of children’s garments which it sells as “play suits.” They are made in age sizes ranging from 4 to 16 inclusive and include garments called “Baseball Play Suits” which are. made in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Samuel Winslow Skate Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  2. Chicago Flag & Decorating Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vogel v. KnoxDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1957
  2. Davar Products, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API