Legal Opinion

Winter Bros. v. Jackson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1958No. 37242PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

1. The defendant contends that the amended petition did not contain a sufficient description of the property to- withstand a general demurrer. The contention is without merit. The following are representative of the descriptions of the various articles: “1 head for 200 gal. mixer, 42" over all, Yz" steel, seamless, value $180.00”, “1 contractor’s drum hoist and base, value $250.00”, “2 International centrifuges and 3 additional bronze heads, value $400.00”, “1 truck transmission, value $12.00”, “2 Turbula agitators 6", value $300.00”. It was alleged that the described…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Graham v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  2. Redd & Co. v. Lathem & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Roddenberry v. FoucheCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayes v. FlaumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  2. Lawyers Co-Operative Publishing Co. v. Bekins Moving & Storage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API