Legal Opinion

Redd & Co. v. Lathem & Sons

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 17, 1922No. 12873PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Trover; from Cherokee superior court — Judge Blair. August 4, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

In an action of bail-trover for the recovery of cotton, a description in the petition in the following terms is sufficiently certain to put the defendant on notice of what property is sued for and to withstand a general demurrer: “A certain lot of cotton consisting of five bales of cotton, described as follows, weighing 450$: more or less, each of the value of $337.50 dollars, the same being the five bales of cotton delivered to W. A. Lathem & Son [the defendants in the trover suit] by Henry McClure during the fall of 1920” (italics ours). See, in this connection, Nichols v. Hampton, 46 Ga.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. A. S. Thomas Furniture Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Charles v. Valdosta Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Nichols v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Collins v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  5. Gatlin v. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Williams v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Winter Bros. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Stipe v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API