Redd & Co. v. Lathem & Sons
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Trover; from Cherokee superior court — Judge Blair. August 4, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
In an action of bail-trover for the recovery of cotton, a description in the petition in the following terms is sufficiently certain to put the defendant on notice of what property is sued for and to withstand a general demurrer: “A certain lot of cotton consisting of five bales of cotton, described as follows, weighing 450$: more or less, each of the value of $337.50 dollars, the same being the five bales of cotton delivered to W. A. Lathem & Son [the defendants in the trover suit] by Henry McClure during the fall of 1920” (italics ours). See, in this connection, Nichols v. Hampton, 46 Ga.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- A. S. Thomas Furniture Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Charles v. Valdosta Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
- Nichols v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Collins v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Gatlin v. Matthews & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. YarbroughCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
- Winter Bros. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Stipe v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928