Legal Opinion
Marcomo Stevedoring Corp. v. Nathanson
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1951PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDi Giovanna, J.
This is a motion brought pursuant to section 47-e of the Personal Property Law to set aside a wage assignment.
The applicants, William Markowitz, the wage assignor and his employer Marcomo Stevedoring Corporation, attack the wage assignment upon the grounds: (1) that the wage assignment was made without consideration; (2) that the wage assignee divested himself of any and all interest in and to said wage assignment when he assigned the notes to a third party; and (3) that the wage assignee failed to comply with sections 42 and 47-a of the Personal Property Law.
*156The facts as they appear in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
- Jasper v. . RozinskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Thompson v. . Erie R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Bloch v. Frankfort Distillery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.