Legal Opinion
McDonough v. Newmans Cloak & Suit Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 4, 1956No. 36,762, 36,763PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*251Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court granting defendant’s motion for judgments notwithstanding the verdicts and denying defendant’s alternative motion for a new trial.
One action was brought by Lillian M. McDonough for the recovery of damages for injuries sustained by her when she fell over a modeling stand or stool in the hallway of the defendant’s store, Newmans Cloak & Suit Company, and another action was brought by her husband, Eugene R. McDonough, for consequential damages to him as a result of said injuries to his wife. The jury returned…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Johnson v. EvanskiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Schrader v. KrieselSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Carpenter v. Herpolsheimer's Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Grzboski v. Bernheimer-Leader StoresCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
- White v. Herpolsheimer CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lindgren v. VogeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Dahlbeck v. DICO Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Muckler v. BuchlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Lehman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Wasserman v. Hutzler Brothers Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.