Legal Opinion
State v. Tapia
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 1, 1969No. 309PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Defendant moved for post-conviction relief under § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S.A.1953 (Supp.1967). His motion was denied with•out a hearing. He appeals, reasserting the ■claims set forth in his motion. In addition, he claims the trial court erred in failing to ■appoint counsel to represent him in connection with his motion.
Claims asserted in his motion.(a) Defendant claims the evidence warranted a verdict of not guilty and that ■certain witnesses called by him were not impeached. These are claims concerning the •credibility of witnesses and the weight to be given their testimony.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Johnson v. AverySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Rodriquez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. HinesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BrusenhanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- State v. SelgadoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Birdo v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. TrejoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
- Pete Tapia, No. 21097 v. Felix Rodriguez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- People v. BoivinColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.