State Bank of Arthur v. Sentel
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of State Bank of Arthur entered against B. G. Sentel and H. E. Kendall on promissory notes executed by them and a cross appeal by the State Bank of Arthur of the dismissal of the suit against Maxine Sentel.
Two separate judgments by confession were obtained, the first on a promissory note for $60,000.00 dated February 23, 1966 and signed by B. G. Sentel and Maxine Sentel and the second, upon a promissory note of the same date and amount signed by H. E. Kendall. After the judgments by confession were opened, the suits were consolidated for subsequent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1967
- Comm. v. GoodmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
- National Bank & Trust Co. v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962
- Meyer v. PfahlerIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by10 opinions
- Green Miller, Jr. v. Lester PoretskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- First National Bank of Elgin v. AchilliAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Chrysler Credit Corporation, Plaintiff-Third/party v. Nancy Marino, and Herman J. Marino, Defendant-Third/partyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Devalk Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Schall v. ForrestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.