Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ward
This case arises from this court’s decision in Schulenburg v. Signatrol, Inc., 33 I11.2d 379. It will be helpful to review briefly that matter in order to facilitate understanding of the issues presented here.
Time-O-Matic Corporation, a plaintiff, is engaged in the production and sale of flashers. A flasher is a device which actuates and regulates the lights in electric signs in such a manner as to animate the sign according to a predetermined program. The individual defendants, while employed by the Time-O-Matic Corporation, traced or memorized confidential particularized information…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. ZimmermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- First National Bank v. Road District No. 8Illinois Supreme Court · 1945
- Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. County of WinnebagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Mortell v. BeckmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Thomas v. DurchslagIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
3Cited by205 opinions
- Kravis v. Smith Marine, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Eychaner v. GrossIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Billie Williams v. Jader Fuel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Estate of Wernick v. MacKsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Dayan v. McDonald's Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
200 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.