Legal Opinion

Smith v. Shell Chemical Co.

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided August 26, 2004No. CIV.A. 02-603-B-M1, CIV.A. 04-284-BPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING

POLOZOLA, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss filed by Shell Chemical Plant (“Shell”) and Burns International Security (“Burns”) 1 , and the Motion to Dismiss filed by the American Arbitration Association. 2 For the reasons which follow, the motions are granted, and the case is dismissed pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

I. Factual Background

The plaintiff, who was directly employed by Burns, filed a lawsuit in Civil Action 02-603 in the Middle District of Louisiana after being released from his position as a night patrol…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mireles v. WacoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. NL IndustriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2009
  2. Holcim (Texas) Ltd. Partnership v. Humboldt Wedag, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  3. Anderson v. Metro By T-MobileDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
  4. Holcim (Texas) Limited Partnership F/K/A Holnam Texas Limited Partnership v. Humboldt Wedag, Inc. and Watkins Engineers & Constructors, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  5. Holcim (Texas) Ltd. Partnership v. Humboldt Wedag, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API