Legal Opinion

Weinn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 30, 2010No. PD-0338-09PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · JohnsonJohnson, J.

in which MEYERS, PRICE, WOMACK, HOLCOMB, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

After his plea in bar on double-jeopardy grounds was overruled, appellant plead nolo contendere to possession with intent to deliver and guilty to manufacture of methamphetamine, both in amount less than 400 grams, but at least 200 grams. After a punishment trial, a jury assessed punishment at 30 years’ imprisonment for each offense. The trial court ordered the two sentences to run concurrently.

On appeal, appellant contended that his conviction of both manufacturing and possession with intent to deliver violated the…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Bigon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Garza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by55 opinions

  1. Loving v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. United States v. Dantana TanksleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  3. John Paul Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
  4. Gerald Christopher Zuliani v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2012
  5. Ex Parte Necessary, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API