Legal Opinion

Rockwell v. Italian-Swiss Colony

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 21, 1909No. Civ. No. 593PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The only ground relied on for a new trial was that of newly discovered evidence, and appellant concedes that “There is no question before t'he court on this appeal other than the ruling of the court in denying defendant’s motion for a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence.”

The defendant A. C. Palladme is the superintendent of the Italian-Swiss colony, and entered into a written contract February 24, 1903, with plaintiff, in which plaintiff agreed to bore a well that would furnish three thousand five…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Oberlander v. Fixen & Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Harralson v. BarrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. O'Rourke v. VennekohlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Putnam v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Pollard v. PollardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Estate of LucasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Kittrell v. ReeseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API