Williams v. Roche Bros. Supermarkets, Inc.
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtWelsh, J.
This action sounds in tort for negligence and for breach of warranty of merchantability. G.L.c. 106, §2-314.
The plaintiff purchased a lemon chicken dinner at the defendant’s supermarket. The dinner contained a maraschino cherry used as a garnish. The maraschino cherry used contained a pit. The maraschino cherry was obtained from a distributor who was named as a third-party defendant by the supermarket. The maraschino cherry was sold as pitted. The plaintiff sought damages for the broken tooth caused by the pit.
The trial judge found for the plaintiff and awarded damages in the sum of $18,500…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gabbidon v. KingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- In re LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Flynn v. Growers Outlet, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Macklin v. MacklinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Phillips v. Town of West SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burns v. McDonald's Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010