Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Clifford J. Lanas, Richard A. Hendershot, and James A. Battista

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 4, 2003No. 01-3248, 01-3491 and 01-3580PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Chief Judge.

Richard Hendershot, James Battista, and Clifford Lanas were convicted on mail fraud charges stemming from a scheme to defraud Hendershot’s former employer, Alexsis Risk Management, Inc. (“Alexsis”), of its intangible right to his honest services. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1346. The defendants now challenge their convictions and sentences on numerous grounds. We affirm in all respects.

I. BACKGROUND

We provide just a general description of the facts here; where additional facts are relevant to particular arguments, we mention them later. Alexsis is engaged in the business of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. Clarence TrotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Michael DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Phillip ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. James Montgomery, United States of America v. Mary O'COnnOrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Jeremiah BergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. Charles WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API