Legal Opinion
Hough v. Shakopee Public Schools
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided March 30, 2009No. Case 07-CV-2508 (PJS/RLE)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR SEPARATE TRIALS
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs were enrolled in special-education programs operated by defendant Minnesota River Valley Special Education Cooperative (“MRVSEC”). Defendant Shakopee Public Schools (“Shakopee”) is one of six school districts that belong to MRVSEC. 1 Shakopee often refers its students with special needs to programs run by MRVSEC. Three of the five plaintiffs in this action were referred by Shakopee to MRVSEC; the other two plaintiffs were referred by districts that are not parties to this…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gurman v. Metro Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Herrera v. Santa Fe Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- Mallak v. Aitkin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Herrera v. SANTA FE PUBLIC SCHOOLSDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Bass v. Anoka CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.