Legal Opinion

Rotenberger v. Burghduff

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 2007No. 24097PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SABERS, Justice.

[¶ 1.] After the circuit court dismissed William Rotenberger’s (Rotenberger) action against Lex Burghduff (Burghduff) for lack of prosecution, Rotenberger brought the same action thirteen months later. Burghduff alleged the action was barred by res judicata and collateral estop-pel. Rotenberger proceeded to bring a motion to vacate the order of dismissal, which the circuit court granted. The circuit court also entered an order of dismissal nunc pro tunc that made the dismissal for lack of prosecution without prejudice. Burghduff appeals three issues. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] On…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dacy v. GorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hrachovec v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Devitt v. HayesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Huber v. Department of Public SafetySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. $1,010.00 IN AMERICAN CURRENCYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. JuchtSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Buchholz v. StorsveSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. MASAD v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kauth v. BartlettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Rotenberger v. BurghduffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API