Legal Opinion

State v. Raschka

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 9, 2004No. 21417-6-IIIPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*105¶1

Schultheis, J.

— A criminal defendant charged in superior court and not in custody must be tried within 90 days unless time is excluded or extended by rule. Former CrR 3.3(c)(1) (2001). Franklin Raschka waived speedy trial up to a certain date as allowed by court rule, but he was not brought to trial before the expiration of the speedy trial waiver. The time for trial was not interrupted and reset by a failure to appear under former CrR 3.3(d)(2) (2001). We therefore reverse his conviction and dismiss the charge.

FACTS

¶2 On February 11, 2002, Franklin Raschka was charged with one count of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. Chavez-RomeroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  2. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State v. TollesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. State Of Washington v. Dennis L. TollesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  5. State Of Washington v. Joseph Leon FrantzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API