Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Stevens

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1931No. 2576PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The will of R. B. Stevens, deceased, designated five persons as independent executors of his estate and directed that no bond be re*474quired of them as such, and contained the usual provision that they should administer the estate free from the control of the probate court. The will was probated March 7, 1927. The executors named ■ qualified and returned into the probate court an inventory, etc., which was approved in May, 1927.

The will in question has been twice before this court. See Hocker v. Piper, 2 S.W.(2d) 997, and Hocker v. Stevens, 18 S.W.(2d) 842.

On October 10, 1930, all of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jerrard v. McKenzieTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Hocker v. PiperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Perkins v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hocker v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cocke v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  2. O'Connor v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Bell v. StillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Alice National Bank v. Corpus Christi Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Edsall v. HutchingsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API