Legal Opinion
Tineo v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 4, 2003No. 02-3636PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FUENTES, Circuit Judge.
The Attorney General and officials of the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (collectively, the “INS”)1 *332appeal the District Court’s partial grant of a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The petitioner, Carlos Ti-neo, is a lawful permanent resident of the United States who briefly left the country to visit the Dominican Republic, his country of citizenship. Upon his return, the INS classified Tineo as an alien “seeking an admission,” detained him, and charged him with being “inadmissible” for having been convicted of…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Demore v. KimSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Cai Luan Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Auguste v. RidgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Ki Se Lee Hyang Mahn Yang v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Malagon De Fuentes v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Gurpinder Othi v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.