Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Hamel-Bishop

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 13, 2002No. 15-00-13702; A113922PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Mother appeals a judgment that denies her motion to set aside an order enforcing a parenting plan. She contends that, among other things, the trial court abused its discretion in denying her motion. We agree and reverse and remand.

The parties were married in Oregon in 1990. They have one minor child. Their marriage was dissolved by stipulated judgment entered in Oregon in 1997. The judgment awarded mother custody of the child, and father was awarded parenting time to be agreed upon by the parties. The judgment provides that, if mother and the child move to another location, travel costs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wicks-Snodgrass v. City of ReedsportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. National Mortgage Co. v. Robert C. Wyatt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Wood v. James W. Fowler Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. Walters v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Trucke v. BaughmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API