Legal Opinion

Trucke v. Baughman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 2007No. CV05-0830; A131855PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDER, J. pro tempore

Mother appeals a default judgment that, among other things, awarded father full custody of their child and required mother to pay father monthly child support. The trial court reinstated the default judgment after it had exercised its discretion under ORCP 71 B1 to set it aside on grounds of excusable neglect. In reinstating the judgment, the trial court determined that it committed legal error in initially setting aside the judgment and that it had no discretion to do so. On appeal, we agree with mother that the trial court properly exercised its discretion to set aside…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  2. McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. In re the Marriage of MayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Benton County State Bank v. West Coast Spruce Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. In re the Marriage of Hamel-BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Union Lumber Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. State v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API