Legal Opinion
Barrentine v. New Jersey Transit
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 2, 2014No. Civ. No. 2:12-3936 (KM)(MAH)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEVIN McNULTY, District Judge:
This matter comes before the court on the motions of Defendants New Jersey Transit and George Piper (Docket No. 37), and Defendants Amalgamated Transit Union Local 822, Sherman Ariel, Calvin Osborn,1 and Vernice Ross (Docket Nos. 40, 41) to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. The Plaintiff, Gabe S. Barrentine, alleges incidents of unacceptable racist speech or conduct, but his complaint must nevertheless be dismissed. Barrentine failed to exhaust his Title VII employment discrimination claim against the labor un*532ion, and the individual defendants are not…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- BASS v. HOWARDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- BASS v. HOWARDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- CARLOR v. BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNCHDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- CEUS v. NEW JERSEY LAWYERS SERVICE, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- CEUS v. NEW JERSEY LAWYERS SERVICE, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.