Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 29, 1921No. 10098PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from District Court, Grady County; Will Linn, Judge. Action by Robert Hughes against Lawrence Martin for loss of bank deposits resulting from failure of bank. Judgment for defendant on demurrer to petition, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Grady county; Hon. Will Linn, Judge.

This proceeding in error was regularly commenced in this court by the plaintiff in error, who was the plaintiff below, filing a regularly certified transcript of the record, • the appeal being from the judgment of the trial court sustaining a demurrer interposed by the defendant to the amended petition of the plaintiff. The parties occupy the same position in this court as that occupied by them, respectively, in the trial court.

Tlie amended petition, omitting the formal parts, is as follows:

“(1) Por canse of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Cragie v. . HadleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Manhattan Bank of Memphis v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. United Society of Shakers v. UnderwoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Howard v. JeffreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. KrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  3. Gilbert v. WelchelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Paris v. BecknerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Edwards v. School Dist. No. 222, Cotton Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API