Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Wagner

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1935No. A-9016PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoyle, J.

(after stating the case). In his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Howard Wagner alleges that he is unlawfully imprisoned and detained in the state penitentiary, without authority of law, under a judgment of conviction entered in the district court of Osage county, for the offense of obtaining money by false pretenses, wherein he was sentenced to serve a term of three years in the state penitentiary, and to pay a fine of $6,600, and costs in the sum of $94; that the penitentiary sentence imposed by said district court has been fully served, in that the only valid sentence imposed upon the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Ex Parte GrantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Ex Parte OwensCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Ex Parte KeelCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1972
  4. Ex Parte CusterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1948
  5. Harry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API