Legal Opinion
Southern Home Insurance v. Willoughby
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 16, 1971No. 46060PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Presiding Judge.
At the outset, we must answer Southern’s contention that it affords no coverage to the customer since the policy provides that "garage customers are not insureds” unless they fit certain listed exceptions (which this customer does not). In other words, they contend the policy excludes a whole class of persons from coverage and that the right to make such an exclusion was upheld in Fireman’s Fund Indem. Co. v. Mosaic Tile Co., 101 Ga. App. 701 (115 SE2d 263). We would agree if this policy merely excluded garage customers as a class. However, a reading of the endorsement…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Shelby Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Federal Insurance Company v. PrestemonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Hollywood Baptist Church of Rome v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Askew v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Carolina Casualty Insurance Company v. Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Westhoff v. American Interinsurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. HoltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Ga. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Southern Gen. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.