State v. Pechilis
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The issues to be decided in this case arise out of two actions brought, by permission, in the original jurisdiction of this Court by the State on the relation of Governor Richard W. Riley and Attorney General Daniel R. McLeod to determine the constitutionality of requirements that those seeking the nomination for the office of magistrate participate in advisory elections. The complaints have been treated as one action for the purpose of presentation and disposition of the issues.
While the State challenges on several grounds the use of advisory elections to determine nominees for the office of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Young v. SappSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
- McKnight v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Breeden v. S. C. Democratic Executive CommitteeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Salley v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Douglas v. McLeodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Kramer v. County Council for Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Kramer v. CTY. COUNCIL FOR DORCHESTER CTY.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981