Legal Opinion

Kramer v. CTY. COUNCIL FOR DORCHESTER CTY.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 21, 1981No. 21566Published

1Opinion of the Court

277 S.C. 71 (1981)

282 S.E.2d 850

P. KRAMER, Master-in-Equity for Dorchester County, Respondent

v.

COUNTY COUNCIL FOR DORCHESTER COUNTY, and Kenneth F. Waggoner, Rollins Edwards, Donald Handelsman, George P. Knight, Shirley Lang, Walter B. Wall, Jr., and T. Coke Weeks, as Members of the Dorchester County Council, Appellants.

21566

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

September 21, 1981.

James A. Bell, St. George, and James B. Richardson, Jr., of Ham & Richardson, Columbia, for appellants.

H.C. Prettyman, Jr., and James H. Abrams, Jr., both of Prettyman, Cordray & Abrams, Summerville, for respondent.

Septemb…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaud v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. CroweSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  3. Cort Industries Corp. v. Swirl, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. Court of Probate of Colleton CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Kramer v. County Council for Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API