Legal Opinion

Breeden v. S. C. Democratic Executive Committee

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 10, 1954No. 16926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This is a proceeding, under a writ of certiorari, to review the action of the State Democratic Executive Committee in refusing to declare petitioner, Edward C. Breed-en, the party nominee for auditor of Marlboro County, and in declaring respondent Roy A. Freeman the nominee for said office.

*207In the first primary held on June 8, 1954, there were three candidates for the party nomination for the office of auditor of Marlboro County, but neither received a majority of the votes cast. Breeden and Freeman, the two high men, ran over in a second primary held on June 22nd. The Marlboro…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McKinney v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. State Ex Rel. Spruill v. BatemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Young v. SappSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  4. McKnight v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1937
  5. King, Ins. Com'r v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PechilisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  2. Lovelle v. ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  3. Thomasena Adams v. Governor McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  4. Thomasena Adams v. Governor McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020
  5. Thomasena Adams v. Governor McMasterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API