Legal Opinion

United States v. Cumberland

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1970No. 5085PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This is an appeal by the United States 1 from the suppression for use as evidence of marijuana ceased from Cumberland incident to his arrest. Because the suppressed contraband 2 is substantial proof of the pending charge, the Government may appeal, and indeed must prevail if its prosecution is to go forward.

Cumberland was arrested without a warrant on June 23, 1969, for disorderly conduct. In the estimation of the officer, who was patient and sensitive to the delicate situation 3 created by Cumberland’s bellicose conduct, he was finally left with no other choice than…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yeatts v. MintonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
  2. Cuffia v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  3. United States v. KettermanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. United States v. YatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. HobbyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API