United States v. Yates
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Associate Judge:
This appeal is from the grant of a pretrial motion to suppress evidence 1 — a loaded pistol. We reverse. A further word appears warranted in light of the manner in which the judge conducted the hearing. This is not the first case in which this problem has presented itself, 2 so our ordinary reluctance to comment on the manner in which a hearing was conducted must give way.
The police, with a search warrant, went to a certain apartment for purposes of searching for and seizure of illegally kept liquor. The judge made oral findings, some relevant and some not relevant to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Griffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Frank Roosevelt HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Edelin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. BurkaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- United States v. EleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Haltiwanger v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- United States v. MillerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.