Robertson v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson
The defendant Railway Company operates its switch-yard on property belonging to it within 1,800 feet of the residence of Mr. and Mrs. Robertson. As a result of such operations, Mr. and Mrs. Robertson sued the railroad for damages to this realty. Their declaration specified the activities of the railroad in the operation of this switch-yard, and alleged that such operation “constitutes a continuous and perpetual nuisance which has greatly depreciated and diminished in value ’ ’ their aforesaid realty. They seek a recovery to the extent of its alleged depreciation.
To the action of the Court in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Terminal Co. v. LellyettTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Harmon v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
- Nashville & Decatur R. R. v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1873
- Johnson v. Utah-Idaho Cent. Ry. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by12 opinions
- Caldwell v. Knox Concrete Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Seaton v. SeatonDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1997
- Anderson v. American Limestone Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
- Butcher v. Jefferson City Cabinet Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
- Clabo v. Great American Resorts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.