Legal Opinion

Waterworks Improvement District of Ashdown v. Rainwater

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 11, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating1 the facts). It is first sought to uphold the judgment on the ground that the bond, by its terms, made the amounts deposited by the improvement districts in the bank payable on demand, and that the granting of the extension of the time of payment for one year by the commissioners constituted a new contract between the bank and the improvement districts which released the sureties on the bond. Wo do not agree with counsel in this contention.

The body of the bond relating to this phase of the case is copied in our statement of facts, and need not be repeated here. Tt…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Talley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prewett v. Waterworks Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  2. Washington County v. StephensIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Morrilton v. MooseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API