Legal Opinion

Prewett v. Waterworks Improvement District No. 1

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 23, 1928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKirby, J.

This is the second appeal of this case, a .statement of which will be found in Waterworks Improvement Dist. v. Rainwater, 173 Ark. 523, 292 S. W. 989. It was held on the former appeal, tinder the facts proved, that the court should have entered judgment in favor of the improvement district upon the bond oif the depository bank and the sureties thereon for the sum of $4,000, with interest at 4 per cent, as provided in the contract between the bank and the improvement district.

The case was reversed and remanded, it being said in the opinion: ‘ ‘ The court erred in not rendering a verdict in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Howard-Sevier Road Improvement District No. 1 v. HuntSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  2. Road District No. 6 v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  3. Morgan Engineering Co. v. Cache River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Deason & Keith v. RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
  5. Newton v. AltheimerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Robertson v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Hastings v. Rose CourtsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  3. Lake v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  4. Olmstead v. Rosedale Building & SupplySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1936

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API