Legal Opinion
Julie Thomas v. Computax Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 27, 1980No. 78-2742PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORDOVA, District Judge:
Julie Thomas (Thomas) brought an action under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f), alleging that Computax Corporation (Computax) discriminated on the basis of sex in hiring a personnel representative. After trial to the Court, judgment was entered in favor of Computax. Thomas appealed pro se.
FACTS
In 1972, Computax advertised that it was seeking a personnel representative. The advertisement stated that Computax preferred applicants with an advanced degree in psychology and who had experience performing the tasks of a personnel officer. Thomas applied for the position, enclosing a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Paul Rodger Weller v. Fred H. Dickson, Andrew Emmitte Pope v. Richard A. McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Clarence v. Watson v. Woodrow C. ButtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Herron v. RozelleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Eugene P. Murphy and the Travelers Insurance Company v. The St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Kayo Oil Company and Max Cook v. Annette SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- S. A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio Grandense (Varig Airlines) v. Walter Kidde & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Syncom Capital Corp. v. WadeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- William C. Richardson v. Mike HenryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Lorenzo W. Coats v. Percy PierreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Portland Feminist Women's Health Center Leila Whittemore Geri Craig Amy Aycrigg v. Advocates for Life, Inc., and Ivars Bitans Roger FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.