Legal Opinion

President, State Bank v. Gaiennie

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided August 15, 1869No. 116PublishedCited by 4 opinions

from the District Court, parish of Natchitoches. .Lewis, J

1Opinion of the CourtIIowe, J.

On the twentieth April, 1860, the defendant, for the ac-

commodation of B. Toledano & .Taylor, made his promissory note to his own order for the sum of §10,956 56, dated at New Orleans, and payable three years after date, and indorsed the same in blank. On the thirteenth April, 1861, more than two years before the obligation matured, it was transferred to the plaintiffs, the Louisiana State Bank, as collateral security for three notes of Toledano & Taylor, amounting in all to $85,000, and falling due in 1863.

The notes lastly mentioned being unpaid, the bank instituted suit thereon in New…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harrison v. Pike Bros. & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Steeg v. CodiferSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. Hammond State Bank v. PerrinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. E. J. Forstall's Sons v. HollingsworthLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API