Legal Opinion

Steeg v. Codifer

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 1, 1924No. 24873PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

Plaintiff, as the holder for value before maturity, brought this suit to recover $3,200, the amount of seven promissory notes, interest, and attorney’s fees. The notes were made by defendant to the order of the Gerson Realty Company, Inc., financial agents.

Defendant answered, admitting that plaintiff “may be the holder” of the notes, but denied that he had acquired them in due course for value and before maturity. 1-Ie averred that the notes were issued by him in payment of stock to the value of $4,000 in the St. Mary Co-operative Farm & Orchard Association upon fraudulent misrepresentations…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. Matthews v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1852
  3. Mechanics' Building Ass'n v. FergusonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1877
  4. Chaffe v. DuBoseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
  5. Hincks v. ConverseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker Bank & Trust Company v. BehrnesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Commercial Credit Corp. v. SetliffLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Collins v. MageeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co. in LiquidationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Foster v. WashingtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API