Legal Opinion

Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services v. Gilmore

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 2003No. A-02-154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*878Hannon, Judge.

INTRODUCTION

On the petition of the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services (the Department), the county court removed Aehul Gilmore as guardian of her adult son Michael R. Gilmore and appointed a successor guardian who was without priority under the statute. Aehul appeals, alleging that the Department did not have standing to institute the proceeding; that the court did not follow required procedures in that it did not appoint a visitor, a guardian ad litem, or an attorney for Michael; and that it removed her without proof that she was unfit or had forfeited her right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services v. StrussNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Guardianship of DonleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Governor's Policy Research Office v. KN EnergyNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In RE CONSERVATORSHIP OF ANDERSON v. LasenNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. In Re Guardianship of HartwigNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Guardianship and Conservatorship of CordelNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In re Guardianship & Conservatorship of BarnhartNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. In re Guardianship of NovacekNebraska Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Nebraska Department of Health & Human Services v. GilmoreNebraska Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API