Legal Opinion

Law v. Fowler

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1927No. 4709PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VARIAN, Commissioner.

This is an action in ejectment for possession of an unpatented mining claim. Appellant, plaintiff in the court below, alleged as a first cause of action that the Montezuma claim was her separate property; that she is now the owner and entitled to the possession thereof, except as to the paramount title of the United States; that on or about June 1, 1924, she was possessed of said property and had been in possession of the same for more than ten years immediately preceding said date, and worked and operated the same as a mining claim; that on or about June 1, 1924,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bismark Mountain Gold Mining Co. v. North Sunbeam Gold Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Humphreys v. Idaho Gold Mines Development Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Flynn Group Mining Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Bell v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  5. Eilers v. BoatmenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Naccarato v. Village of Priest RiverIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Lind v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Skaw v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Lucky Five Mining Co. v. Central Idaho Placer Gold Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. White v. Ames Mining CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API