Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Whited
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1964PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff, the Commissioner of the State Bureau of Labor, from a judgment order of the circuit court which sustained the defendants’ demurrer and dismissed the complaint. The order sustained subsection 2 of defendants’ demurrer:
“* * * on the grounds that ORS 652.335 is unconstitutional and void as a denial of substantive due process in that it is not within the power of the legislature to create a debt from one person to another without the consent of the person charged unless for some breach of contract, express or implied, or for some tort or crime and ORS 652.110…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. Environmental Improvement CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Withers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. McMasterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State ex rel. Nilsen v. HemstreetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. WhitedOregon Supreme Court · 1964