Medeiros v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for damages in the sum of $500 sustained by reason of personal injuries resulting from drinking a bottle of Coca-Cola manufactured by defendant.
Plaintiff’s complaint, which was in two counts, alleged in the first count that defendant was engaged in the business of bottling, selling and distributing Coca-Cola which it sold and distributed to various dealers for the purposes of resale to the general public; that plaintiff had purchased a bottle of Coca-Cola from a dealer in Stanislaus County, which had been bottled by defendant and sold…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Ward Baking Co. v. TrizzinoOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
- Taylor v. PoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- MacK v. Hugh W. Comstock Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Emden v. VitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Wisniewski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.