Legal Opinion

Medeiros v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1943No. Civ. 6664PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for damages in the sum of $500 sustained by reason of personal injuries resulting from drinking a bottle of Coca-Cola manufactured by defendant.

Plaintiff’s complaint, which was in two counts, alleged in the first count that defendant was engaged in the business of bottling, selling and distributing Coca-Cola which it sold and distributed to various dealers for the purposes of resale to the general public; that plaintiff had purchased a bottle of Coca-Cola from a dealer in Stanislaus County, which had been bottled by defendant and sold…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Klein v. Duchess Sandwich Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Rozumailski v. Philadelphia Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Ward Baking Co. v. TrizzinoOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Taylor v. PoleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  3. MacK v. Hugh W. Comstock Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Emden v. VitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Wisniewski v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API