Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 18, 1983No. 1825PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order of the lower court which granted appellee, Thomas Joseph Carney, a new trial. 1 The Commonwealth alleges that the lower court committed an error of law when it ruled a new trial was required owing to a prosecution witness’s response on direct examination. We conclude, from our examination of the record, that the lower court did in fact err when it granted appellee a new trial. Therefore, we reverse and remand for reinstatement of appellee’s verdict, disposition of appellee’s remaining post-verdict motions and for sentencing.

Appellee was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SpruillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. GroceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. DeCampliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API