Commonwealth v. Carney
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from an order of the lower court which granted appellee, Thomas Joseph Carney, a new trial. 1 The Commonwealth alleges that the lower court committed an error of law when it ruled a new trial was required owing to a prosecution witness’s response on direct examination. We conclude, from our examination of the record, that the lower court did in fact err when it granted appellee a new trial. Therefore, we reverse and remand for reinstatement of appellee’s verdict, disposition of appellee’s remaining post-verdict motions and for sentencing.
Appellee was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SpruillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. GroceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. DeCampliSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987