Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pennsylvania v. Ritchie

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1987No. 85-1347Published

1Dissent

Justice Stevens,

with whom Justice Brennan, Justice Marshall, and Justice Scalia join, dissenting.

We are a Court of limited jurisdiction. One of the basic limits that Congress has imposed upon us is that we may only review “[f]inal judgments or decrees rendered by the highest court of a State in which a decision could be had.” 28 U. S. C. § 1257. The purposes of this restriction are obvious, and include notions of efficiency, judicial restraint, and federalism. See Construction Laborers v. Curry, 371 U. S. 542, 550 (1963); Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. Johnson, 326 U. S. 120, 124 (1945). Over the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API