Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hamm

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1984No. 1058, 1059PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

James Hamm and Raymond Hamm, brothers, were tried together by jury, and each was convicted of two counts of burglary, 1 theft by unlawful taking, 2 receiving stolen property, 3 and criminal conspiracy. 4 In this consolidated direct appeal following the denial of post verdict motions and the imposition of sentence, James and Raymond challenge (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain their convictions; (2) the trial court’s refusal to sever their cases and try them separately; and (3) the trial court’s refusal to grant a mistrial after the assistant district attorney had…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. BachertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. CasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MoralesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. GelormoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. LitzenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API