Commonwealth v. Hamm
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
James Hamm and Raymond Hamm, brothers, were tried together by jury, and each was convicted of two counts of burglary, 1 theft by unlawful taking, 2 receiving stolen property, 3 and criminal conspiracy. 4 In this consolidated direct appeal following the denial of post verdict motions and the imposition of sentence, James and Raymond challenge (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain their convictions; (2) the trial court’s refusal to sever their cases and try them separately; and (3) the trial court’s refusal to grant a mistrial after the assistant district attorney had…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. BachertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. CasperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MoralesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HassineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. GelormoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. LitzenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.