Legal Opinion

Miller v. Gooding Highway District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1935No. 5837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBudge, J.

Appellants brought this action against the Gooding Highway District to recover damages on account of injuries received and suffered by William George Miller, a minor, caused by the explosion of a dynamite cap taken by young Miller from a building owned by respondent. In this connection the facts are substantially as follows: Respondent owns and maintains a yard enclosed by a high board fence with a gate, within the corporate limits of the city of Gooding. The building entered is located in the northeast corner of the enclosure. It had two windows, both of which were some distance above the…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Powers v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Birge v. GardinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
  4. City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Finlayson v. WallerIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Hake v. DeLaneIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ells v. ScandrettDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API