Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Tri-State Motor Transit Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided February 22, 1989No. Civ. 6743, Civ. 6744PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant, Tri-State Motor Transit Company (Tri-State), petitions this court to issue writs of mandamus directing the trial court to dismiss two pending workmen's compensation suits for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our scope of review is limited to deciding whether the trial court is legally required to dismiss either case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.Ex parte CSX Transportation, Inc., 533 So.2d 613 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987); Ex parte State Health Planning DevelopmentAgency, 500 So.2d 1149 (Ala.Civ.App. 1986).

The record reveals that Tri-State, a Delaware corporation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CSX Transp., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1987
  2. Seales by Seales v. Daniel Const. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Singleton v. Hope Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Thomas J. Crider v. Zurich Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  5. Ex Parte State Health Planning & Development AgencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Foster-Wheeler Constructors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
  2. Heartland Express v. GardnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Ex Parte Fluor CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  4. Ex Parte Fluor CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
  5. Ex Parte Fluor CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API